Independent, group, or chain.
Same governance. Different scope.
The Escapra contract is identical at every scale — authorize, revalidate, settle, audit. What changes is the shape of the scope and the size of the audit. Below: how three hotel shapes use it.
Protect parity. Govern a focused set of trusted partners.
Who it's for — Single-property independents, boutique, design, and lifestyle hotels. Lean teams. Strong direct brand. Sensitive to rate parity erosion and silent re-distribution.
Today's pain
- —A single rate-parity breach damages your direct conversion for weeks.
- —You authorize a small number of partners — but you cannot see what they pass downstream.
- —Reconciliation with each partner is a per-partner phone call. Time you do not have.
What Escapra adds
- +Scoped authorization for the partners you trust — and only those partners.
- +Live revalidation against your PMS at every confirmation. No silent repricing.
- +Lineage propagation: downstream re-distribution is recorded, not assumed.
- +Settlement reconciles as a read. No phone-call audits.
Outcomes
- ✓Rate parity defended where it is sold, not just where it is published.
- ✓A short, governed partner list — broadened only when performance demonstrates trust.
- ✓Reclaimed team hours: no reconciliation, no rate-drift fire-drills.
Central governance across properties. Per-property overrides where they matter.
Who it's for — Hotel groups operating 5–50 properties across one or more brands or regions. Central distribution / revenue function with property-level GMs who need autonomy on scope and terms.
Today's pain
- —Central policy is set in slides; enforcement is per-property and uneven.
- —A partner approved for one property quietly appears at another via a downstream chain.
- —Roll-up reporting is a spreadsheet exercise; disputes are escalated by email.
What Escapra adds
- +Central authorization rules with per-property scoping — defined once, enforced always.
- +Per-property override of rate plans, restrictions, and expiry without breaking central policy.
- +Consolidated settlement visibility — one read across the portfolio.
- +Governance, inventory, and cancellation decisions captured per booking, queryable per property or rolled up.
Outcomes
- ✓Central distribution becomes operational, not advisory.
- ✓GMs keep autonomy where it matters; central keeps policy where it must.
- ✓Audit posture is portfolio-wide — defensible to owners, lenders, and auditors.
Scoped distribution by brand, region, or segment. Enterprise audit posture.
Who it's for — Multi-brand, multi-region chains. Distribution policy is a function with multiple stakeholders: brand teams, regional commercial, revenue, IT, legal, audit.
Today's pain
- —Distribution policy is fragmented across brands and regions; partner scopes are inconsistent.
- —Compliance and audit teams cannot reconstruct who authorized what, when, for which booking.
- —Settlement integrity is a quarter-end exercise instead of a daily property.
What Escapra adds
- +Authorization scoped by brand, region, segment, rate plan, geography, and date range.
- +Append-only audit of every governance, inventory, cancellation, and settlement decision.
- +Atomic, idempotent settlement with reconciliation as a read — at chain scale.
- +Operational incidents deduped, classified, and queryable per scope; signals never silent.
Outcomes
- ✓Distribution policy becomes the system — not the slide deck.
- ✓Compliance and audit get a queryable record instead of a reconstruction project.
- ✓Chain-grade settlement integrity, end-to-end.
One platform. Three shapes. The same five pillars.
Govern · Authorize · Validate · Settle · Audit — at every scale. An independent hotel and a multi-brand chain enforce the same contract; only the scope and roll-up differ.
Govern
Authorize
Validate
Settle
Audit
Map it to your portfolio.
A walk-through using your properties, your scopes, and your settlement cadence. Free to connect. 2% on confirmed bookings.